CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 1971; 21:368-378
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.21.6.368
© 1971 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rosai, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rosai, J.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 21, 368-378, Copyright © 1971 by American Cancer Society


The Pathology of Tumors, Part Four

Lauren V. Ackerman M.D.1 and Juan Rosai M.D.2

1 professor of Surgical Pathology and Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, and Surgical Pathologist, Barnes Hospital and affiliated hospitals, St. Louis, Missouri.
2 Assistant Professor of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, and Surgical Pathologist, Barnes Hospital and affiliated hospitals.

Both grading and staging of neoplasms are used to give the therapist clues to the prognosis of cancer. Grading (I-IV) designates the relative differentiation of cells that compose the tumor (grade I, highly differentiated to grade IV, undifferentiated). Theoretically the prognosis deteriorates as the cells become less differentiated; however, grading gives no information about the prognosis of certain tumors (e.g., melanoma). Many pathologists prefer to grade tumors as well-differentiated, moderatedly differentiated, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated rather than using the corresponding number.

Staging refers to the extent of tumor spread. Tumors are usually staged in numbers (I-IV); however, the clinical staging of some cancers has been standardized into the T (tumor) N (nodes) M (metastases) system of the International Union against Cancer.

The classification of tumors should be as simple as possible to avoid confusion and is most valuable when correlated with the clinical features, natural history and ultimate prognosis.

Carcinoma classification usually depends on the organ of origin, whereas sarcoma and lymphoma are generic terms and may be applied regardless of anatomic location. The carcinoma in situ classification is used for a lesion that has all the histologic attributes of malignancy, except invasion. However, a small biopsy showing only carcinoma in situ may be the outer edge of an invasive cancer. In most cases carcinoma in situ will progress to invasive cancer if left untreated.

The classification of sarcomas has progressed from descriptive (round cell or giant cell, etc.) to histogenetic (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, etc.). The type, subtype and local extent of sarcomas will determine how radical surgery must be. In malignant lymphomas, exact histologic classification is particularly important, as some types (e.g., Hodgkin's disease) are now curable in many cases with appropriate therapy. The accurate diagnosis and classification of lymphoma is a difficult problem for the pathologist and requires great care in the preparation of tissue for examination.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by American Cancer Society.