CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 1983; 33:26-39
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.33.1.26
© 1983 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, M.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 33, 26-39, Copyright © 1983 by American Cancer Society


Screening for Breast Cancer: How Effective Are Our Tests? A Critical Review

Myron Moskowitz M.D.1

1 Director of the Breast Cancer Detection Center of the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, and Professor of Radiology of the Department of Radiology of the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in Cincinnati, Ohio.

The primary goal of screening for breast cancer is to detect the disease at a smaller size and presumably earlier stage. A review of the literature is presented, which evaluates the ability of thermography, mammography, and clinical examination to lower the threshold size at detection and evaluate the predictive value of a positive test as compared with the prevalence of cancer existing in the population reported. We have found little evidence to indicate that clinical thermography lowers the stage at detection, and neither does a positive thermogram in screening seem to have a strong predictive value. Clinical examination can lower threshold over current threshold levels, but only at the expense of a very high biopsy rate. The data reported in the literature show that mammography can advance the stage at detection and have a reasonably high predictive value compared with the isoprobability baseline.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. C. Sharp, R. Michielutte, R. Freimanis, L. Cunningham, J. Spangler, and V. Burnette
Reported Pain Following Mammography Screening
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2003; 163(7): 833 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. Michielutte, M. B. Dignan, and B. L. Smith
Psychosocial Factors Associated with the Use of Breast Cancer Screening by Women Age 60 Years or Over
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 625 - 647.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by American Cancer Society.