HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE COVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a letter to the editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 35, 197-213, Copyright © 1985 by American Cancer Society

Survey of Physicians' Attitudes And Practices in Early Cancer Detection

Most primary care physicians are already involved in some form of cancer detection in asymptomatic patients, and most say their involvement is increasing. With the exception of the proctoscopic examination and mammography, major detection procedures are being used with asymptomatic patients by a majority of physicians.

In many instances, physicians' use of detection procedures does not conform with guidelines for the cancer-related checkup recommended by the American Cancer Society. Although they may disagree with some guidelines, most physicians agree they are generally helpful.

Physicians disagree with guidelines for mammography, because they feel the cost of the test and radiation exposure associated with its use argue against patients' being tested annually, or being tested at all in the absence of symptoms. In contrast, belief that testing is needed at least once a year is the basis for physicians' disagreement with Pap test guidelines. Physicians also resist discontinuing use of the chest x-ray for early cancer detection, because they want to screen smokers annually.

While there is substantial agreement on the value of proctoscopy in cancer detection in asymptomatic people, many physicians are not doing a proctoscopic exam if a patient's stool blood test is negative. Patient fear, discomfort, and the cost of testing influence physician decisions against proctoscopic examination. However, the growing interest in flexible sigmoidoscopy may change attitudes and influence practice toward more general use of proctoscopy.

Primary care physicians widely support cancer education, both for the public and with patients in their own practice.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Hebert-Croteau, J. Brisson, J. Latreille, G. Gariepy, C. Blanchette, and L. Deschenes Time Trends in Systemic Adjuvant Treatment for Node-Negative Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1458 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Sladden and J. E. Ward Do Australian Family Physicians Screen Smokers for Lung Cancer? Chest, March 1, 1999; 115(3): 725 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Preisser, S. J. Cohen, J. L. Wofford, W. P. Moran, B. J. Shelton, M. W. McClatchey, and P. Wolfe Physician and Patient Predictors of Health Maintenance Visits Arch Fam Med, July 1, 1998; 7(4): 346 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Cardozo, J. Steinberg, M. B. Lepczyk, L. Binns-Emerick, Y. Cardozo, and A. N. F. Aranha Improving Preventive Health Care in a Medical Resident Practice Arch Intern Med, February 9, 1998; 158(3): 261 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. L. Dickey and D. B. Kamerow Primary Care Physicians' Use of Office Resources in the Provision of Preventive Care Arch Fam Med, July 1, 1996; 5(7): 399 - 404. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. R. Phillips Diagnostic and Screening Procedures in Family Practice: Past, Present, and Future Use Arch Fam Med, October 1, 1993; 2(10): 1051 - 1057. [Abstract] [PDF]