CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 1989; 39:326-336
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.39.6.326
© 1989 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drago, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drago, J. R.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 39, 326-336, Copyright © 1989 by American Cancer Society


The Role of New Modalities in the Early Detection and Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Joseph R. Drago MD1

1 Louis Levy Professor of Cancer, Chief of the Division of Urology, and Director of Urologic Oncology at the Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio.

New as well as standard techniques for the detection and diagnosis of early prostate cancer have been described. These include the use of digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasound, prostatic acid phosphatase, the Biopty gun, and cell ploidy, as well as the diagnosis of premalignant lesions of the prostate, such as prostatic dysplasia or, more appropriately, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

All of these innovations may enhance our ability to diagnose and follow patients with early prostate cancer. Full documentation and evaluation of long-term (15 to 20 years) follow-up, however, are needed to determine whether these new techniques will make a difference in the ultimate morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer in the United States.

In the meantime, however, the use of these new diagnostic tools should not be avoided. We must advance with technology, and as the technologies grow and develop we should increase our understanding about the utility of each of these new tests and combine them with the older standard tests that have served us well for many years.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by American Cancer Society.