CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47:150
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.47.3.150
© 1997 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leitch, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leitch, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. A.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 47, Issue 3 150-153, Copyright © 1997 by American Cancer Society


ARTICLES

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997

A. M. Leitch, G. D. Dodd, M. Costanza, M. Linver, P. Pressman, L. McGinnis and R. A. Smith
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) convened a workshop in March 1997 to consider new scientific findings related to breast cancer screening and to determine whether these findings warrant a change in the existing ACS guidelines. The meeting was timed so that participants could benefit from new data related to screening women aged 40 to 49 years. A recommendation based on the new data and subsequently approved by the ACS Board of Directors is reported.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. B. Dailey, S. V. Kasl, T. R. Holford, L. Calvocoressi, and B. A. Jones
Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Predictors of Nonadherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2293 - 2303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. B. Dailey, S. V. Kasl, T. R. Holford, and B. A. Jones
Perceived Racial Discrimination and Nonadherence to Screening Mammography Guidelines: Results from the Race Differences in the Screening Mammography Process Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 165(11): 1287 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
F. Sassi, H. S. Luft, and E. Guadagnoli
Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Female Breast Cancer: Screening Rates and Stage at Diagnosis
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 96(12): 2165 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. A. Berry, K. A. Cronin, S. K. Plevritis, D. G. Fryback, L. Clarke, M. Zelen, J. S. Mandelblatt, A. Y. Yakovlev, J. D. F. Habbema, E. J. Feuer, et al.
Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.
N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1784 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Barth Jr., G. R. Gibson, P. A. Carney, L. A. Mott, R. D. Becher, and S. P. Poplack
Detection of Breast Cancer on Screening Mammography Allows Patients to Be Treated with Less-Toxic Therapy
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 324 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Calvocoressi, S. V. Kasl, C. H. Lee, M. Stolar, E. B. Claus, and B. A. Jones
A Prospective Study of Perceived Susceptibility to Breast Cancer and Nonadherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines in African American and White Women Ages 40 to 79 Years
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2096 - 2105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. V. Destounis, P. DiNitto, W. Logan-Young, E. Bonaccio, M. L. Zuley, and K. M. Willison
Can Computer-aided Detection with Double Reading of Screening Mammograms Help Decrease the False-Negative Rate? Initial Experience
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 578 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. R. Yabroff, N. Breen, S. W. Vernon, H. I. Meissner, A. N. Freedman, and R. Ballard-Barbash
What Factors Are Associated with Diagnostic Follow-Up after Abnormal Mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 723 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. K. Bobo, J. A. Shapiro, J. Schulman, and C. L. Wolters
On-Schedule Mammography Rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 620 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Smith-Bindman, P. W. Chu, D. L. Miglioretti, E. A. Sickles, R. Blanks, R. Ballard-Barbash, J. K. Bobo, N. C. Lee, M. G. Wallis, J. Patnick, et al.
Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom
JAMA, October 22, 2003; 290(16): 2129 - 2137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, B.-M. Ljung, and D. Grady
Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities
Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2003; 139(4): 274 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
B. B. Green and S. H. Taplin
Breast Cancer Screening Controversies
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2003; 16(3): 233 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, D. Saslow, K. Andrews Sawyer, W. Burke, M. E. Costanza, W. P. Evans III, R. S. Foster Jr., E. Hendrick, H. J. Eyre, and S. Sener
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2003; 53(3): 141 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
L. G. Ford, L. M. Minasian, W. McCaskill-Stevens, E. D. Pisano, D. Sullivan, and R. A. Smith
Prevention and Early Detection Clinical Trials: Opportunities for Primary Care Providers and Their Patients
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2003; 53(2): 82 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2003
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2003; 53(1): 27 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. R. Parisky, A. Sardi, R. Hamm, K. Hughes, L. Esserman, S. Rust, and K. Callahan
Efficacy of Computerized Infrared Imaging Analysis to Evaluate Mammographically Suspicious Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 263 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Reuben, L. W. Bassett, S. H. Hirsch, C. A. Jackson, and R. Bastani
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Benefit of Offering On-Site Mobile Mammography in Addition to Health Education for Older Women
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1509 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Silva, J. Silva, A. Sanchez, J. M. Garcia, G. Dominguez, M. Provencio, L. Sanfrutos, E. Jareno, A. Colas, P. Espana, et al.
Tumor DNA in Plasma at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Patients Is a Valuable Predictor of Disease-free Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3761 - 3766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J. H. Newhouse
Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 165 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale
Ann Intern Med, September 3, 2002; 137(5_Part_1): 344 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. M. McGreevy, L. F. Baron, and D. G. Hoel
Clinical Breast Examination Practices among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 555 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Feig
Image Quality of Screening Mammography: Effect on Clinical Outcome
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 805 - 807.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, A. C. von Eschenbach, B. Levin, C. Cohen, C. D. Runowicz, S. Sener, D. Saslow, and H. J. Eyre
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2002; 52(1): 8 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
G. N Hortobagyi
Progress in Systemic Chemotherapy of Primary Breast Cancer: an Overview
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, December 1, 2001; 2001(30): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. A. Skinner, H. Silberman, W. Dougherty, P. Gamagami, J. Waisman, R. Sposto, and M. J. Silverstein
Breast Cancer After Augmentation Mammoplasty
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2001; 8(2): 138 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. Ringash
Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 1, 2001; 164(4): 469 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, A. C. von Eschenbach, R. Wender, B. Levin, T. Byers, D. Rothenberger, D. Brooks, W. Creasman, C. Cohen, C. Runowicz, et al.
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer: Update of Early Detection Guidelines for Prostate, Colorectal, and Endometrial Cancers: ALSO: Update 2001--Testing for Early Lung Cancer Detection
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2001; 51(1): 38 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. L. KASISKE, M. A. VAZQUEZ, W. E. HARMON, R. S. BROWN, G. M. DANOVITCH, R. S. GASTON, D. ROTH, J. D. SCANDLING JR., and G. G. SINGER
Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2000; 11(2007): S1 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. K. Bobo, N. C. Lee, and S. F. Thames
Findings From 752 081 Clinical Breast Examinations Reported to a National Screening Program From 1995 Through 1998
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 21, 2000; 92(12): 971 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. J. Warren Burhenne, S. A. Wood, C. J. D'Orsi, S. A. Feig, D. B. Kopans, K. F. O'Shaughnessy, E. A. Sickles, L. Tabar, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Castellino
Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 554 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Feig
Age-related Accuracy of Screening Mammography: How Should It Be Measured?
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 633 - 640.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. Kerlikowske, P. Salzmann, K. A. Phillips, J. A. Cauley, and S. R. Cummings
Continuing Screening Mammography in Women Aged 70 to 79 Years: Impact on Life Expectancy and Cost-effectiveness
JAMA, December 8, 1999; 282(22): 2156 - 2163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. A. Sickles
Probably Benign Breast Lesions: When Should Follow-up Be Recommended and What Is the Optimal Follow-up Protocol?
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 11 - 14.
[Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. U. Yood, B. D. McCarthy, N. C. Lee, G. Jacobsen, and C. C. Johnson
Patterns and Characteristics of Repeat Mammography among Women 50 Years and Older
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 1999; 8(7): 595 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. M. Shaneyfelt, M. F. Mayo-Smith, and J. Rothwangl
Are Guidelines Following Guidelines?: The Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Peer-Reviewed Medical Literature
JAMA, May 26, 1999; 281(20): 1900 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. W. Bassett, V. P. Jackson, G. Cardenosa, D. B. Kopans, C. J. D'Orsi, M. N. Linver, P. J. Dempsey, E. B. Mendelson, D. D. Dershaw, B. Monsees, et al.
Risk of Risk-Based Mammography Screening, Ages 40 to 49
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 730 - 730.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
S. A. Fox, K. Pitkin, C. Paul, S. Carson, and N. Duan
Breast Cancer Screening Adherence: Does Church Attendance Matter?
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 1998; 25(6): 742 - 758.
[Abstract]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. N. Hortobagyi
Treatment of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., October 1, 1998; 339(14): 974 - 984.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by American Cancer Society.