|
|
|||||||||
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 47, Issue 4 243-256, Copyright © 1997 by American Cancer Society
J. S. Macdonald
Adjuvant therapy for colon cancer is now a mature and widely accepted
standard of care for patients with resected large bowel tumors: adjuvant
therapy for stage III colon cancer has also been shown to be highly
cost-effective. The cost of 5-FU/levamisole therapy for stage III colon
cancer per year of life saved is less than $ 5,000, which represents a
favorable cost-benefit relationship for a medical intervention. The
clinician managing a patient with colon cancer at the present time has
several options for therapy. In patients with stage III colon cancer,
therapy with 5-FU-based regimens clearly increases overall and disease-free
survival. It is also clear that the results that have been obtained are not
perfect; therefore, the first option of therapy should always be an ongoing
clinical trial. Many such trials are available, and Table 7 lists currently
active studies in the United States. The clinician managing a patient with
stage III colon cancer who is not in a clinical trial may choose a variety
of regimens administered for durations of 6 to 12 months (Table 8). The
preponderance of evidence suggests that 5-FU plus levamisole for 12 months
is equal in efficacy to 5-FU plus leucovorin-based regimens given for a
shorter period of time. A clinician may still choose the 5-FU plus
levamisole regimen because of the decreased oral, myelosuppressive, and
diarrheal toxicities associated with that regimen as opposed to the
5-FU/leucovorin regimens. Portal vein infusion of fluorinated pyrimidines
still must be considered investigational. Finally, although we cannot be
absolutely sure about the benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with
resected node-negative colon cancer, the NSABP data suggest that some
benefit may be seen in these patients. It is known that patients with stage
II cancers demonstrating high-grade bowel obstruction or bowel perforation
have poor prognoses with surgery alone. Such patients may be good
candidates for adjuvant therapy. Also, a major effort to define high risk
and low risk for recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer by
analyzing molecular genetic factors (tumor ploidy and alternations in tumor
suppressor genes) may lead to a selection of Dukes B patients definitely
requiring adjuvant therapy.
ARTICLES
Adjuvant therapy for colon cancer
Temple University Cancer Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Brenner, A. Gondos, and V. Arndt Recent Major Progress in Long-Term Cancer Patient Survival Disclosed by Modeled Period Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3274 - 3280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Potosky, L. C. Harlan, R. S. Kaplan, K. A. Johnson, and C. F. Lynch Age, Sex, and Racial Differences in the Use of Standard Adjuvant Therapy for Colorectal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2002; 20(5): 1192 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Dignam, L. Colangelo, W. Tian, J. Jones, R. Smith, D. L. Wickerham, and N. Wolmark Outcomes Among African-Americans and Caucasians in Colon Cancer Adjuvant Therapy Trials: Findings From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project J Natl Cancer Inst, November 17, 1999; 91(22): 1933 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | COVER ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |