CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50:156
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.50.3.156
© 2000 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, V. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, V. G.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 50, Issue 3 156-170, Copyright © 2000 by American Cancer Society


ARTICLES

Breast cancer prevention: a review of current evidence

V. G. Vogel
Comprehensive Breast Program, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, PA, USA.

The National Cancer Institute has created a breast cancer risk assessment tool that quickly estimates a woman's individualized absolute risk of developing breast cancer. Understanding the magnitude of risk is important because recent data show that breast cancer incidence may be reduced. All women may improve their overall health and thus perhaps minimize breast cancer risk by maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding cigarettes, limiting alcohol consumption, getting regular exercise, and avoiding non-diagnostic ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, no lifestyle modifications have yet been proven to prevent or definitively lower the risk of breast cancer. In addition, women whose personal breast cancer risk is high may consider reducing risk by pharmacologic or surgical means. In such women, a five-year course of tamoxifen reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer by 49%; women with lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia experienced even greater risk reductions. Because of the potential for vascular and endometrial side effects, women who are candidates for a preventive course of tamoxifen must be counseled regarding its relative risks and benefits. Prophylactic mastectomy offers at least a 90% reduction in the risk of breast cancer, but the physical and psychological changes involved in such a procedure make it a difficult choice for many women. Breast cancer risk assessment and appropriate counseling are becoming standard components of breast cancer screening and overall health maintenance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
R. Taylor and K. Taguchi
Tamoxifen For Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Low Uptake by High-Risk Women After Evaluation of a Breast Lump
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 242 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
F M Hodges, J S Svoboda, and R S Van Howe
Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2002; 28(1): 10 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
M. Zhong, Z. Lu, T. Abbas, A. Hornia, K. Chatakondu, N. Barile, P. Kaplan, and D. A. Foster
Novel Tumor-promoting Property of Tamoxifen
Cell Growth Differ., April 1, 2001; 12(4): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by American Cancer Society.