CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56:143-159
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.3.143
© 2006 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Freely available CME: Take the course for this article:
Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winawer, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rex, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winawer, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rex, D. K.

Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society*,,{dagger}

Sidney J. Winawer, MD, Ann G. Zauber, PhD, Robert H. Fletcher, MD, MSc, Jonathon S. Stillman, MD, Michael J. O’Brien, MD, MPH, Bernard Levin, MD, Robert A. Smith, PhD, David A. Lieberman, MD, Randall W. Burt, MD, Theodore R. Levin, MD, John H. Bond, MD, Durado Brooks, MD, MPH, Tim Byers, MD, MPH, Neil Hyman, MD, Lynne Kirk, MD, Alan Thorson, MD, Clifford Simmang, MD, David Johnson, MD and Douglas K. Rex, MD


Dr. Winawer is Paul Sherlock Chair in Medicine, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Dr. Zauber is Associate Attending Biostatistician, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Dr. Fletcher is Professor, Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Dr. Stillman is Gastroenterology Fellow, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Dr. O’Brien is Professor, Medical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Dr. B. Levin is Vice President, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Dr. Smith is Director, Cancer Screening, Cancer Control Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
Dr. Lieberman is Chief, Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Dr. Burt is Interim Executive Director, Huntsman Cancer Institute; and Professor of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Dr. T.R. Levin is Associate Chief, Gastroenterology Department, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA.
Dr. Bond is Professor of Medicine, University of Minnesota; and Chief, Gastroenterology, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Dr. Brooks is Director, Prostate and Colorectal Cancer, Cancer Control Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
Dr. Byers is Program Leader, Clinical Cancer Prevention and Control; and Professor, Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO.
Dr. Hyman is Chief, General Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Dr. Kirk is Tim and Toni Hartman Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Dr. Thorson is Clinical Associate Professor of Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine and the University of Nebraska College of Medicine; and Program Director, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE.
Dr. Simmang is Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Dr. Johnson is Professor of Medicine; and Chief, Gastroenterology, Eastern Virginia School of Medicine, Norfolk, VA.
Dr. Rex is Chair, US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer; and Professor of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
This article is available online at http://CAonline.AmCancerSoc.org

Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings uncovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or have a diagnostic workup for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas as well as missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which demonstrated clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance be 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003, these guidelines were updated, colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, and stratification at baseline into lower and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have demonstrated that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present paper, a careful analytic approach was designed addressing all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be more definitely stratified at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either three or more adenomas, or high-grade dysplasia, or villous features, or an adenoma ≥1 cm in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have one or two small (<1 cm) tubular adenomas with no high-grade dysplasia can have a follow up in 5 to 10 years, whereas people with hyperplastic polyps only should have a 10-year follow up as average-risk people. Recent papers have reported a significant number of missed cancers by colonoscopy. However, high-quality baseline colonoscopy with excellent patient preparation and adequate withdrawal time should minimize this and reduce clinicians’ concerns. These guidelines were developed jointly by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society to provide a broader consensus and thereby increase utilization of the recommendations by endoscopists. Adoption of these guidelines nationally can have a dramatic impact on shifting available resources from intensive surveillance to screening. It has been shown that the first screening colonoscopy and polypectomy produces the greatest effects on reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Compr Canc NetwHome page
R. W. Burt, J. S. Barthel, K. B. Dunn, D. S. David, E. Drelichman, J. M. Ford, F. M. Giardiello, S. B. Gruber, A. L. Halverson, S. R. Hamilton, et al.
Colorectal Cancer Screening
J Natl Compr Canc Netw, January 1, 2010; 8(1): 8 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. Sifri, R. Wender, D. Lieberman, M. Potter, K. Peterson, T. K. Weber, and R. Smith
Developing a Quality Screening Colonoscopy Referral System in Primary Care Practice: A Report from the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable
CA Cancer J Clin, December 18, 2009; (2009) caac.20048v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, M. van Ballegooijen, A. G. Zauber, J. D. F. Habbema, and E. J. Kuipers
Effect of Rising Chemotherapy Costs on the Cost Savings of Colorectal Cancer Screening
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 21, 2009; 101(20): 1412 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. G. Zauber, I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, A. B. Knudsen, J. Wilschut, M. van Ballegooijen, and K. M. Kuntz
Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, November 4, 2008; 149(9): 659 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Meza, J. Jeon, S. H. Moolgavkar, and E. G. Luebeck
Age-specific incidence of cancer: Phases, transitions, and biological implications
PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16284 - 16289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland, R. A. Smith, D. Brooks, K. S. Andrews, C. Dash, F. M. Giardiello, S. Glick, T. R. Levin, et al.
Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 130 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley
Cancer Screening in the United States, 2008: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Cancer Screening Issues
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 161 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. E. Martinez, E. T. Jacobs, E. L. Ashbeck, R. Sinha, P. Lance, D. S. Alberts, and P. A. Thompson
Meat intake, preparation methods, mutagens and colorectal adenoma recurrence
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 2019 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre
Cancer Screening in the United States, 2007: A Review of Current Guidelines, Practices, and Prospects
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2007; 57(2): 90 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. M. Psaty and J. D. Potter
Risks and benefits of celecoxib to prevent recurrent adenomas.
N. Engl. J. Med., August 31, 2006; 355(9): 950 - 952.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. K. Rex, C. J. Kahi, B. Levin, R. A. Smith, J. H. Bond, D. Brooks, R. W. Burt, T. Byers, R. H. Fletcher, N. Hyman, et al.
Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Cancer Resection: A Consensus Update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2006; 56(3): 160 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by American Cancer Society.