HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE COVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a letter to the editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klein, W. M. P. Articles by Stefanek, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klein, W. M. P. Articles by Stefanek, M. E.

Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication

Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception

Dr. Klein is Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Dr. Stefanek is Vice President, Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.

This article is available online at http://CAonline.AmCancerSoc.org

Cancer risk perceptions are a key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. J. Han, W. M. P. Klein, T. C. Lehman, H. Massett, S. C. Lee, and A. N. Freedman Laypersons' Responses to the Communication of Uncertainty Regarding Cancer Risk Estimates Med Decis Making, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 391 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Dearborn and L. D. McCullough Perception of Risk and Knowledge of Risk Factors in Women at High Risk for Stroke Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1181 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Quillin, D. K. McClish, R. M. Jones, D. B. Wilson, K. A. Tracy, D. Bowen, J. Borzelleca, and J. N. Bodurtha Duration of an Intervention's Impact on Perceived Breast Cancer Risk Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 855 - 865. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Gramling, W. Klein, M. Roberts, M. E. Waring, D. Gramling, and C. B. Eaton Self-Rated Cardiovascular Risk and 15-Year Cardiovascular Mortality Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2008; 6(4): 302 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Thun, L. M. Hannan, and M. Stefanek Risky Business: Tools to Improve Risk Communication in a Doctor's Office J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 830 - 831. [Full Text] [PDF]