CA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57:367-378
doi: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367
© 2007 American Cancer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a letter to the editor
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaloupka, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaloupka, F.

The Economic Impact of Clean Indoor Air Laws

Michael Eriksen, ScD and Frank Chaloupka, PhD

Dr. Eriksen is Director and Professor, Institute of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Dr. Chaloupka is Distinguished Professor, Health Policy Center and Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.

This article is available online at http://CAonline.AmCancerSoc.org
Disclosures: The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Georgia Cancer Coalition (M.P.E.) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's ImpacTeen project (F.J.C.) for conducting the research to prepare this manuscript.

Clean indoor air laws are easily implemented, are well accepted by the public, reduce nonsmoker exposure to secondhand smoke, and contribute to a reduction in overall cigarette consumption. There are currently thousands of clean indoor air laws throughout the Unites States, and the majority of Americans live in areas where smoking is completely prohibited in workplaces, restaurants, or bars. The vast majority of scientific evidence indicates that there is no negative economic impact of clean indoor air policies, with many studies finding that there may be some positive effects on local businesses. This is despite the fact that tobacco industry-sponsored research has attempted to create fears to the contrary. Further progress in the diffusion of clean indoor air laws will depend on the continued documentation of the economic impact of clean indoor air laws, particularly within the hospitality industry. This article reviews the spread of clean indoor air laws, the effect on public health, and the scientific evidence of the economic impact of implementation of clean indoor air laws.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
V. Cokkinides, P. Bandi, C. McMahon, A. Jemal, T. Glynn, and E. Ward
Tobacco Control in the United States--Recent Progress And Opportunities
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2009; 59(6): 352 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
M. C. Fiore and T. B. Baker
Stealing a March in the 21st Century: Accelerating Progress in the 100-Year War Against Tobacco Addiction in the United States
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2009; 99(7): 1170 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
B Houle and M Siegel
Smoker-free workplace policies: developing a model of public health consequences of workplace policies barring employment to smokers
Tob. Control, February 1, 2009; 18(1): 64 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Nice try
Daniel Hass
CA Online, 4 Mar 2008 [Full text]
Getting the Facts Right--Reply to Hass
Michael Eriksen, ScD, et al.
CA Online, 4 Mar 2008 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVECOVER ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by American Cancer Society.