|
|
|||||||||
Electronic Letters to:
|
|
Electronic letters published:
|
|
|||
|
Scarlett L Gomez, Research Scientist Northern California Cancer Center, Christina A. Clarke, Ellen T. Chang, Theresa H.M. Keegan, Dee W. West, Sam So, and Sally L. Glaser
Send letter to journal:
scarlett{at}nccc.org Scarlett L Gomez, et al.
|
Dear Editor: We read with interest the informative paper “Cancer incidence, mortality, and associated risk factors among Asian Americans of Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese Ethnicities” by McCracken and colleagues [1]. We agree that examining cancer patterns for specific Asian subgroups can both illuminate understanding of cancer etiology and provide more targeted data for public health services and clinicians, as also indicated by our work documenting cancer incidence patterns among Asian subgroups [2-11]. McCracken et al. also presented estimated rates from GloboCan for selected Asian countries. Likewise, we have previously compared rates between Asians in the US and Asia, using data collected by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [12-15]. This type of study can be particularly valuable for informing the respective roles of genetic and environmental risk factors in cancer causation. Future work comparing cancer rates and trends among Asian Americans by immigration status and length of residence in the US should also be informative, albeit challenging to conduct, given the strong bias in the availability of patient birthplace in population-based cancer registry data that we have documented [4, 7, 9, 16]. McCracken et al. note that updated national cancer statistics on specific Asian subgroups are not available. This deficiency is a result of the inconsistent availability of high-quality data on Asian population counts for specific geographic areas needed for cancer rate denominators. The US Census Bureau provides counts for detailed Asian subgroups as part of the decennial census but not for intercensal years, thus limiting analyses of detailed trends in cancer rates in these groups. To overcome these limitations, we have produced annual intercensal population estimates for Chinese, Filipinos, Japanese, Vietnamese, Koreans, and South Asians (six of the largest Asian subgroups in California), using a demographic population estimation method [17] that enhances simple linear interpolation/extrapolation. Using these annual population estimates, we have documented important subgroup variations and changes over time in liver and breast cancer incidence in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area [17-19]. We observed more than a two-fold difference in incidence rates of breast cancer across the Asian subgroups, with a rate increase over time (1990-2002) in Chinese, Koreans, Vietnamese, and South Asians (groupswith a generally higher proportion of recent immigrants) that is not apparent in Japanese and Filipina women; the rate increase among Chinese women is more pronounced for lobular carcinoma, a trend that may be attributable to patterns of postmenopausal hormone therapy use [19]. McCracken et al. showed that liver cancer rates were highest among Vietnamese and Koreans; our recent analysis showed consistently high liver cancer incidence rates over time among Vietnamese, Koreans, and Filipinos between 1990 and 2004, but not Chinese men (who have also traditionally experienced high rates of liver cancer) or Japanese men or women [18]. These patterns suggest a changing distribution in the burden of liver cancer across Asian subgroups but a continuing need for targeted prevention methods given their persistently high rates. In their analysis, McCracken et al. did not include South Asians, despite their status as the third largest as well as the fastest growing Asian subgroup in this country [20]. We have shown that incidence rates in this group are generally lower than those in other Asian subgroups for most cancers, except for oral, prostate, and breast [21]. For the latter two malignancies, rates in South Asians have increased steadily since the early 1990s and lie between those of more acculturated (i.e., Japanese), and less acculturated (i.e., Koreans and Vietnamese) subgroups [17, 19]. Continued study of cancer incidence in South Asians has clinical and public health relevance as well as the potential to enhance understanding of cancer etiology, given the unique lifestyle, dietary characteristics, and immigration patterns of this group. As noted by McCracken et al., Asians in the US are a highly heterogeneous and growing population—the fastest growing racial group in the US [22]. Understanding cancer occurrence and outcome in specific Asian subgroups is important from clinical, public health, and epidemiological perspectives [23-31]. As the Asian populations continue to expand and diversify, thus comprising recent immigrants, distant past immigrants, and US-born Asians, all with distinct lifestyles and cancer patterns, it will be critical to collect, analyze, and report cancer data among Asian Americans over time. To facilitate this work, we should advocate for routine production by the Census or other government agencies of detailed, yearly population estimates similar to those being produced for other racial/ethnic groups. Only by documenting cancer occurrence by Asian subgroups, and comparing cancer incidence and mortality patterns and trends among these varied groups, can we understand the reasons for the unique distribution and disparities in cancer occurrence in this heterogeneous population. Regards, Scarlett Lin Gomez, PhD 1,2
1 Northern California Cancer Center, Fremont, CA Acknowledgments: The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Health Services as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center, and contract N02-PC-15105 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement #U55/CCR921930-02 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Health Services, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their contractors and subcontractors is not intended nor should be inferred. References 1. McCracken M, Olsen M, Chen MS, Jr., et al. Cancer incidence, mortality, and associated risk factors among Asian Americans of Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese ethnicities. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(4):190-205. 2. Gomez SL, Glaser SL. Quality of birthplace information obtained from death certificates for Hispanics, Asians, and Pacific Islanders. Ethn Dis 2004;14(2):292-295. 3. Gomez SL, Glaser SL: Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:771-781. 4. Gomez SL, Glaser SL, Kelsey JL, Lee MM. Bias in completeness of birthplace data for Asian groups in a population-based cancer registry (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2004;15(3):243-253. 5. Gomez SL, Glaser SL, Kelsey JL, et al. Inconsistencies between self-reported ethnicity and ethnicity recorded in a health maintenance organization. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:71-79. 6. Gomez SL, Le GM, West DW, et al. Hospital policy and practice regarding the collection of data on race, ethnicity, and birthplace. Am J Public Health 2003;93(10):1685-1688. 7. Lin SS, Clarke CA, O'Malley CD, Le GM. Studying cancer incidence and outcomes in immigrants: methodological concerns. Am J Public Health 2002;92(11):1757-1759. 8. Lin SS, Kelsey JL. Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research. Epidemiol Rev 2000;22(2):187-202. 9. Lin SS, O'Malley CD, Clarke CA, Le GM. Birthplace and survival among Asian women diagnosed with breast cancer in cancer registry data: the impact of selection bias (letter). Int J Epidemiol 2002;12(4):511-513. 10. Lin SS, O'Malley CD, Lui SW. Factors associated with missing birthplace information in a population-based cancer registry. Ethn Dis 2001;11:598-605. 11. Swallen KC, Glaser SL, Stewart SL, et al. Accuracy of racial classification of Vietnamese patients in a population-based cancer registry. Ethn Dis 1998;8(2):218-227. 12. Gomez SL, Le GM, Clarke CA, et al. Cancer incidence patterns in Koreans in the US and in Kangwha, South Korea. Cancer Causes Control 2003;14(2):167-174. 13. Le GM, Gomez SL, Clarke CA, et al. Cancer incidence patterns among Vietnamese in the United States and Ha Noi, Vietnam. Int J Cancer 2002;102:412-417. 14. Prehn A, Lin S, Clarke C, et al. Cancer Incidence in Chinese, Japanese and Filipinos in the US and Asia 1988-1992. Union City, CA: Northern California Cancer Center; 1999. 15. Glaser SL, Hsu JL. Hodgkin's disease in Asians: incidence patterns and risk factors in population-based data. Leuk Res 2002;26(3):261-269. 16. Gomez SL, Glaser SL. Quality of birthplace data from the cancer registry for Hispanics. Cancer Causes Control 2005;16(6):713-723. 17. Gomez SL, Le GM, Miller T, et al. Cancer Incidence among Asians in the Greater Bay Area, 1990-2002. Fremont, CA: Northern California Cancer Center; 2005. 18. Chang ET, Keegan TH, Gomez SL, et al. The burden of liver cancer in Asians and Pacific Islanders in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area, 1990 through 2004. Cancer 2007;109(10):2100-2108. 19. Keegan TH, Gomez SL, Clarke CA, et al. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence among 6 Asian groups in the Greater Bay Area of Northern California. Int J Cancer 2007;120(6):1324-1329. 20. Reeves TJ, Bennett CE. We the People: Asians in the United States, in Census 2000 Special Reports. Edited by U.S. Census Bureau: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census; December 2004. 21. Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, Asian Law Caucus, National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium: The Diverse Face of Asians and Pacific Islanders in California. Asian & Pacific Islander Demographic Profile. Los Angeles, CA; 2005. 22. Hispanic and Asian Americans increasing faster than overall population [press release]. http://www.census.gov/PressRelease/www/releases/archives/race/001839.html. 23. Gomez SL, Clarke CA, Glaser SL. Cancer survival in US racial/ethnic groups: heterogeneity among Asian ethnic subgroups. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(5):631-632; author reply 632. 24. Gomez SL, France AM, Lee MM. Socioeconomic status, immigration/acculturation, and ethnic variations in breast conserving surgery, San Francisco Bay area. Ethn Dis 2004;14(1):134-140. 25. Lin SS, Clarke CA, Prehn AW, et al. Survival differences among Asian subpopulations in the United States after prostate, colorectal, breast, and cervical carcinomas. Cancer 2002;94(4):1175-1182. 26. Lin SS, Phan JC, Lin AY. Breast cancer characteristics of Vietnamese women in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area. Western J Med 2002;176:87-90. 27. Prehn AW, Topol B, Stewart S, et al. Differences in treatment patterns for localized breast carcinoma among Asian/Pacific islander women. Cancer 2002;95(11):2268-2275. 28. Robbins AS, Koppie TM, Gomez SL, et al. Differences in prognostic factors and survival among white men and Asian men with prostate cancer, California, 1995-2004. Cancer in press. 29. Li CI. Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival in the United States. Ethn Dis 2005;15(suppl 2):S2-9. 30. Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer hormone receptor status and histology by race and ethnicity among women 50 years of age and older. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:601-607. 31. Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(1):49-56. |
|||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | COVER ARCHIVE | SEARCH |